Categories
Film Reviews

I Am Love

www.iamlovemovie.com
Magnolia Pictures

I have been hiding in a box, trying to ignore the crappy, tragic mess of production that gets farted out daily. If you too are bored by predictable, trite and dull cinema as I have been recently you will love this cinematic Italian family drama. Sure you will have to read some subtitles, but Christ, people can still read can’t they? I Am Love begins at the house of the Recchi’s, an important wealthy Milanese family, in which we discover Russian-born Emma, has married into. She plays the stylish, cold, intelligent housewife to her detached and distant husband Tancredi, who is always working away. The extravagant parties she throws leave her as a bystander, and she departs early or finds ways to slink off alone. That is until she meets her son Edo’s friend and business partner Antonio, a young and brilliant chef. In one of the most engaging and heady scenes Emma is taken to Antonio’s restaurant with her mother and law and ‘soon-to-be’ daughter in law. In a spectacular scene, Emma eats a dish Antonio has made, and it’s exciting, lush and incredibly sensual. She is engaged in an illicit affair with a prawn dish, while her mother and daughter in law discuss bland formalities. This obviously leads on to a deep, intense full blown physical affair. With Antonio, not the prawn.

Everything seems to change for Emma when she discovers her daughter Betta is not only gay, but also in a happy relationship. She lovingly accepts and sympathises with her grown children. There is a beautiful scene when Betta gives her grandfather a new piece of art she has done, (usually in the form of painting or drawing), only this time it’s a photograph, of which he doesn’t really enjoy or understand. Emma soothes and reassures Betta, they are affectionate and intimate, and it’s then Betta confides in her mother, requesting she doesn’t tell her father or grandfather, as they wouldn’t understand. Later Edo realises that his mother has been unfaithful to his father, and in turn, him and takes it a bit too far outside by the pool. The following events show Emma being released from her wealthy, respectable cage to the freedom she’s always given her children, in a touching and pulse racing crescendo. John Adams masterfully showers the film in a strange, operatic and eerie soundtrack, which perfectly complements the style of the film.

I Am Love is simple and elegant, rich and powerful but equally beautiful and delicate. It’s an incredibly arresting and almost theatrical portrayal of love, family, passion and the cocoon that wealth and desire bring. The story, technique and style are pleasing to watch, but it’s the acting and soundtrack that keep you drawn in throughout. Admittedly, if you’re not really in the right frame of mind for this it will appear trivial and maybe just too visually over-the-top. But even if this is the case, the luscious and picturesque surroundings, phenomenally stylised outfits (Jil Sander and Fendi), will not only make you want to go to Milan, but will leave you feeling lustful and cultured, even if you really, really hated reading the subtitles.

Emily Paget

Categories
Film Reviews

The Killer Inside Me

www.killerinsideme.com
Revolution Films

Jim Thompson’sThe Killer Inside Me‘ is widely regarded as one of the seminal works of first-person-narrated-serial-killer type book, written with such harrowing inside knowledge and conviction you fear the author may actually be a psychopath themselves. Once very living, now rather dead legend Stanley Kubrick, for better or worse, described it as the most chilling and believable first person account of a criminally warped mind he’d ever read. Indeed, the novel still resonates with a deeply unsettling clarity even now, some fifty years since its initial publication. Barring Burt Kennedy’s 1976 version, no one has successfully managed to put this work of psycho sexual noir on to the screen. Hello, 2010, Hello, Michael Winterbottom.

Straight off the bat it’s pretty clear that this is a dream project for Winterbottom. A man no stranger to controversy with his films (see 9 Songs) and also possessing a deft touch at handling narrative and character (see 24 Hour Party People). The movie is narrated by Lou Ford (Casey Affleck…being scary as shit), a deputy sheriff in a small Texan town. He’s asked to run local prostitute, Joyce (Jessica Alba), out of town. Needless to say, bad things happen. Indeed, their meeting is the catalyst that ends up unleashing a whole host of Ford’s crazy, crazy, crazy all over the town.

The film manages a very tricky balancing act, it successfully shows the crooked world view of a criminally disturbed individual, but also shows his actions impacting on a real tangible world, to real tangible people, with fragile lives. This is in part down to Winterbottom’s excellent direction and cinematography; the lights all seem a little too bright and the dark a little too dark. He really manages to capture and sustain a thick atmosphere of noir dread.

What really, really pulls the movie along is the cast of actors assembled, and the performances they bring. Affleck’s always been a pretty creepy actor…he just has a sort of constant stock blankness over his face at all times, that is clearly masking a fevered intelligence working behind it. He possess an otherworldly…something…that is simultaneously supremely captivated and extremely uncomfortable to watch. In the role of Ford he takes this creepy talent of his a transatlantic flight further than anything he has done prior. Jessica Alba plays Joyce with such a naïve, confused fragility that it is not only totally believable that this is indeed a life that Ford is about to completely destroy, but also utterly heartbreaking. The same can be said for Kate Hudson’s turn as Amy, Ford’s potential wife to be. She’s totally in love with this man, and exudes such an effortless likeability and small town charm, that Ford’s terrible deeds strike that little bit harder against the audience, as we watch with increasing awareness that her fate was sealed the moment she met this man that she blindly walks along with.

Now seems to be an ideal moment to bring up the controversies that have coiled around this film. The sequences that sparked the debate, which I won’t go into, have been labeled as misogynistic and putrid by some. Indeed, it’s understandable why; the women are subjected not only to Ford’s relentless anger but also the cameras total fixation on every little detail. However, to simply pass of these scenes as misogynistic seems over-zealous. They certainly don’t ruin what is a near faultless piece of cinema, sure they make it a little harder to bear…but that’s ok. This is a dark, unsettling film about a dark, unsettling character doing dark and unsettling things to people that do not deserve what becomes of them. It’s also brooding, atmospheric, brilliantly played and extremely compelling.

You may not want to see it again, but you’ll be glad you saw it once.

Jonathan Day

Categories
Film Reviews

Toy Story 3

disney.go.com/toystory
Disney Pixar

Over the past 15 years Disney Pixar has taken animated film to realms few could possibly have predicted. No longer can we use the word “children’s film” to describe animation, as Pixar have created worlds and characters that get to the heart of complex human emotions, irrespective of age. Pixar appreciates the power of a child’s imagination and it’s this that makes their films perfect for kids, yet they also reignite the child in us “grownups”.

The studio’s latest venture takes us back to where it all began; Pixar’s first feature length film, Toy Story. Of course, this is now the third instalment in the franchise, but this is not a film churned out purely for corporate gain. Although it has already broken box office records in the US, the film is as lovingly put together as you would expect from anything baring the Pixar stamp. Woody, Buzz and the gang are back, this time coming to terms with Andy (now 17 years old) moving to college. After their desperate attempts to be played with fall short, the toys are donated to the seemingly idyllic daycare centre, Sunnyside.

Inevitably things are not what they seem as the toys are imprisoned by a group of soured Sunnyside veterens, led by the twisted and mentally scarred Lots O’ Huggin Bear. Among the best of the new characters are Ken (brilliantly voiced by Michael Keaton), Trixie (Kristen Schaal) and Mr Pricklepants (a porcupine voiced by Timothy Dalton), who play varied and beautifully detailed roles. The ensemble voice cast is brought together purposefully, not as a showcase of wacky cameos (see the Night of the Museum films), but as characters which all add depth and colour to the film. The world of toys is brilliantly observed and explored, down to the materialistic instincts of Barbie and Ken and the loving relationship between Mr and Mrs Potato Head. Just as there are extended scenes of children creating their own toy narratives within the film, its creators are essentially playing with their own set of toys in the characters they have so carefully sculpted.

It was widely commented that Pixar’s last two films Up and Wall-E had been unexpectedly sad for films primarily aimed at kids, and you can expect more of the same from Toy Story 3. During its 108 minute duration you may well need a box of tissues close by, whether it be from sadness or laughing yourself to tears at a Buzz Lightyear stuck in Spanish mode. I had my reservations about the making of a third Toy Story film (the only Pixar film to date to have gone so far as a sequel), but these doubts have been cast aside by a film that completes and enhances the series in every way. Pixar perfection as usual then, I should never have suspected anything but.

Sleekly Lion

Categories
Film Reviews

Robin Hood

www.robinhoodthemovie.com
Universal

From Sir Ridley Scott, the Director of Alien and Hannibal comes the much-anticipated Robin Hood, based on the legend of the heroic outlaw.

The action film stars Russell Crowe as Robin Longstride, an archer in late 12th century England who alongside three other soldiers, find their way home after the death of King Richard the Lionheart. Upon arriving in England, Robin assumes the identity of Robert Loxley to prevent the family land being taken by the crown, which has now been given to King John (Oscar Isaac), the younger arrogant brother of Richard, who has no remorse for the poor. When Sir Godfrey, an English Knight deceives the King, everyone must battle together to prevent a French invasion. This climax of the film is one of the most exciting scenes. The scenery is consistently beautiful but ever more so here. It quite literally takes away your breath as you try to follow the good guys. Synchronisation of the archers and horsemen while taking into consideration those on the beach is tremendous.

Upon hearing Russell Crowe has been cast to play Robin Longstride a.k.a Robin Hood, doubts are inevitable. Can he or anyone for that matter do the character justice? The answer is a sure fire yes. This is Crowe’s fifth collaboration with the Director and with a passion for the character since childhood on his side, there seemed no one more fitting. Likewise, Cate Blanchett as the cleaver and very strong-willed Marion, gives another shocking and very impressive performance and portrayal.

For someone that has seen the 1991 Kevin Costner take on the legendary Robin Hood, there may be some conflicting elements to the story, such as the introduction of Marian (Blanchett) and Little John (Kevin Durand). What you must take into consideration is that both films must stand-alone, neither is meant to reflect of the other. So if you are heading out to see this one and have some recognition of a past movie, forget all you know, sit back and take this one in full swing.

Michelle Moore

Categories
Film Reviews

Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call: New Orleans

www.badlt.com
Lionsgate

Even though the Werner Herzog film Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call: New Orleans, appears to borrow from Abel Ferrara’s 1992 film Bad Lieutenant, it is in no way related to it; the only connection apart from the name being a drug addicted crooked cop.

Terrence McDonagh (Nicolas Cage) is a New Orleans Police Sergeant, who in the wake of Hurricane Katrina saves a prisoners life and is promoted. Unfortunately due to his courage, he suffers a serious back injury and as a result, prescribed long-term medication. Six months later, McDonagh is addicted to painkillers as well as non- prescription drugs and takes advantage of his position as Lieutenant and his girlfriend situation as a prostitute to get what he needs. This includes getting in with a known drug leader, threatening the lives of two old ladies and fixing a football match to pay off his debts. The movie ends skipping one year later, showing McDonagh appearing to be on the right track with his career and family while still with a drug habit. He runs into the prisoner he saved at the start of the film and gets encouragement from him to sort his life out once and for all. This re-introduction of the prisoner rounds the film off in a strange but rather fitting way. Considering McDonagh’s pain is caused a result of the prisoners escape, it gives McDonagh the reassurance that saving the prisoner was worth the pain and now the prisoner will repay his gratitude by getting McDonagh off of drugs.

The character of a drug-addicted cop is nothing new to the big screen, but the way in which Cage portrays such a character is incredible. He gives his best performance in ages in astounding detail and believability. At times he takes you back with how unbelievably elevated his personality appears, how crazed and dangerous he can become and how far he can take advantage of those around him. Eva Mendes starred alongside Nicholas Cage in Ghost Rider in 2007 and they make a welcomed return to the big screen together. Val Kilmer however has seen better days. He has portrayed characters in the legal profession before but doesn’t seem to do this character justice, mainly due to the limited part. It is about time Kilmer got back onto the big screen with a much larger role.

If there were to be only one reason to see Bad Lieutenant, then Cage’s performance would be it.

Michellle Moore

Categories
Film Reviews

Hot Tub Time Machine

www.kicksomepast.com
20th Century Fox

Even though the new comedy flick Hot Tub Time Machine has such as silly and unbelievably ridiculous plot, there is something about it that works and it concludes as a comical story. The year begins as 2010 but not for long when three friends escape their terrible city lives of Los Angels and head for Kodiak Valley Ski Resort. After a crazy night of drinking and relaxing in a hot tub, the guys wake up during Winterfest ‘86. At first, they set out on a path to act out the same events of that night fourteen years ago, but decide this may be their only opportunity to put right the things in their lives that went wrong, change their destinies and make the futures they had always wanted.

The plot is not an original idea as the thought of being sent back to the past has been used in numerous other films and because of it you may tend to expect a let down of a movie. However, although the ‘returning to the past’ plot may be repetitive, the same cannot be said for the way in which the four fellas go about returning to their younger days. Hot tub plus alcohol plus four fellas up for a few days of reminiscing and you get transported back to 1986 to relive a night you would rather forget. The events from here on are more humourous- forks in the eyebrow, drunken speeches and brawls as well as the conception of the youngest and the revelation of his father.

The film features a very favourable cast including John Cusack, Rob Corddry, Craig Robinson and Clark Duke. As well as these, it also features actors from 1980s films such as Chevy Chase, Crispin Glover (Back to the Future) and William Zabka (Karate Kid). All are welcomed back to the big screen, but Chase as the Hot Tub repairman and Glover as a one armed hotel clerk are particularly notable for their onscreen humour.

Hot Tub Time Machine may not be the most innovative, the most inventive or the most hilarious film that 2010 has had on offer as of yet. One thing it does have is the inanity to actually charm its way into your life for its 100-minute duration. It will surprise you!

Michelle Moore

Categories
Film Reviews

A Nightmare on Elm Street

www.nightmareonelmstreet.com
Warner Brothers

There have been many remakes or revisions as they have come to be called over recent years and the producers of the new A Nightmare on Elm Street have been responsible for a few of them; The Texas Chain Saw Massacre (2003), The Amityville Horror (2005) and Friday the 13th (2009). Unfortunately, where these three all seemed to work well with the adapted story and characters introduced, this is not the case for A Nightmare on Elm Street.

Set in the present day, the story is quite similar to that of the original. Freddy wronged parents, they take revenge and set him alight, he then returns many years later killing their children in their dreams. The main feature that has been changed and the major downfall of the film is the alteration of the image and persona of Freddy Krueger. Where he was a child killer in the original and returned in their dreams to kill those he never managed to all those years ago. The remake has turned him into an abuser of children. This completely alters your perspective of the character and what he has become. The name that once haunted you and put fear into your mind has now become a name of disgust, someone more sinister and sickening. Played by Jackie Earle Haley, his persona is now cocky and perverted rather than terrifying. There is no one but Robert Englund capable of carrying of this character and wearing the infamous Kruger glove.

When the original was first released back in 1984 it became legendary and is still considered one of the best slasher films of its time. In terms of plot, this one isn’t half bad. There is the repetition of some of the more memorable elements from the original such as Nancy’s bath scene, but there are also many new death scenes and menacing things going on. There are also new characters introduced, such as Nancy Holbrook, played by Rooney Mara. The character is loosely based on Nancy Thompson with a differing personality. The one to watch out for though is Kyle Gallner who plays Quentin. He brings a lot to of passion to the character and story.

If you dismiss all thoughts regarding the original character of Krueger, the film turns out to be a decent watch. However if Wes Craven had been approved to put his ten cents in, it would have likely had been an incredible addition to the franchise. It is nowhere near as terrible as the Halloween remake, but not as good as Friday the 13th.

Michelle Moore

Categories
Film Reviews

Shelter

www.sheltermovie.co.uk
Icon films

The new supernatural horror-thriller Shelter looks set to become one of the most endearing films to be released of 2010 so far. It will startle you, make you squirm and most importantly, keep you intrigued and guessing right until the end….and beyond.

It centres on Dr. Cara Jessup (Julianne Moore), a devoted scientist yet a woman of God. No matter the things life throws at her, including the horrifying murder of her husband, she keeps her faith. She makes a living out of challenging those that claim they have multiple personality disorders. However when introduced to Adam (Jonathan Rhys Meyers), she meets a man about to challenge everything she believes. The further she delves into Adam’s background the more she unearths about his condition and it is not all natural. When the life of her daughter is put at risk, she must push past her beliefs in God as well as science and take a road that explores something a little more supernatural.

The thing about the narrative structure the film follows is that the audience learn about Adam’s condition at the same pace as Dr. Jessup. When she takes a step further into his fractured psyche, as do we, the people watching. Together audience and protagonist experience one startling moment after another; from Adam’s neck movements and his sudden appearances to the emerging corpses he leaves in his tracks. It gets to the critical point where each side of the camera has the complete story and then audiences watch as Adam is dealt with. Camera angels and music back up the strong narrative very well. As Halloween set you on edge with its music, the suspense filled style here puts you on the edge of your seat, sometimes for a fright, but at other times to build a false preservation.

Casting the characters appears spot on. Moore as Dr. Jessup is a windowed working mother, trying to look after her daughter, deal with the death of her husband and still carry on as normal. She looks the part and at first appears fragile but gains much strength as her relationship with Adam develops. Meyers is astonishing as Adam, an undetermined mind. It is as though he takes on a bundle load of characters from old men to a little girl to a wheelchair bound young man. He alters his accent as well as his entire persona depending on the requirements the characters needs; a brilliant man to watch.

Be warned for an unexpected and quite intriguing ending. Not sure if it is preparation for a sequel or just an opened ended narrative…you decide.

Michelle Moore

Categories
Film Reviews

The House of the Devil

www.thehouseofthedevilmovie.com

What do you want from a horror movie? For many lovers of the genre we want shocking, things that that will make you squirm in your seat, gore, blood and something so terrifying your mouth will drop and your heart beat twice as fast as it usual. If this were the sort of thing you would expect to see then The House of the Devil is going to be a huge disappointment. If on the other hand you are looking for something set in the 1980’s (although filmed in 2009) with less gore and more waiting around, then it may be up your alley.

The film focuses on the satanic side of the 1980s as the central theme, while also combining elements of the slasher and haunted house sub-genres. Re-using the “babysitting” them, which we have seen countless times before, college student Samantha takes on a job, unknown to her before hand it is to look after an elderly woman rather than a child. Things are iffy from the initial phone call made to the house. She gradually becomes more and more suspicious about the house and its occupants. As it turns out, the residents are Satanists intent on making Samantha their next interest, not a sacrifice but something much more frightful. The film claims to be based upon true events, but where and when are never actually stated, which is disappointing as it is often more frightening to experience a film such as this when some, even the most minimal of knowledge of the actual event is known.

What creates a lack of interest from a start is that it takes well over an hour to actually get into the satanic element, considering this is the most focal point it was unpleasing to say the least. Even after this hour, things seem to be crammed into the remaining 30 minutes or so. Girl drugged, kidnapped and put through hell. This side of things should have taken more time to develop and gone into much more detail, possibly built up over the entire film to the last critical point where things explode. As far as spooky houses go though, this eerie, isolated mansion is brilliant.

It appears a similar style is used to that of horror films from the 1970’s and 1980s, such as filming techniques and technology. Because of this, The House of the Devil will likely be a complete flop against rising sensations such as the Saw franchise and previous slasher’s like Scream.

Michelle Moore

Categories
Film Reviews

The Crazies

Paramount Pictures

This 2010 remake of The Crazies builds on the story of a small town whose water supply is contaminated by an unknown poison. The original 1973 flick had two subplots, one following the civilians and the other involving the political and military leaders trying to contain the epidemic. The remake has both of these elements but focuses on the efforts the inhabitants of the small town take; how they discover the water supply is contaminated, how they go about resolving the issue, their reaction to the military involvement and their willpower to save loved ones from the containment massacre.

The plot has similarities to Cabin Fever with the toxin in the water causing everyone troubles. The principal narrative kicks in pretty quickly which is always good. You are instantly curious as to why a man is entering a high school baseball game carrying a gun and from this moment the locals begin to act odd and quite dangerous, including murdering their loved ones. It is when the telephones and Internet service goes down and the local are estranged from the outside world that Dr. Judy Dutton (Radha Mitchell), her husband Sheriff David Dutton (Timothy Olyphant) and Dutton’s Deputy Russell Clank (Joe Anderson) realise they are in trouble. When the military round up the locals for “testing”, the torture they are subjected to is unpleasant, and their methods are completely inhuman. Shooting those that do not comply, taking children away from their parents with out a reason and segregating those that have a fever with the ones they suspect are unaffected, including the Sheriff and his pregnant wife.

As the plot deepens, you realise the military’s plans for the town are in fact even worse than you could have ever imagined. Whether you have a taste for violence, the gruesome slaughtering of infected individuals or the rotting flesh of zombie like folk trying to take a slash you, or just the seriousness of the issue regarding contaminated water and the military’s merciless acts again innocent people, there is not doubt something that will keep your attention engaged.

As the film concludes and you sit back in your chair contemplating what you have just seen, the film gently links in with a vision that sets up a sequel, so don’t be surprised if THE CRAZIES return for another jolting experience in another town in the future.

Michelle Moore